Should Philosophers care about the history of philosophy Essay

Should Philosophers dole out about the register of ism - Essay ExamplePhilosophers should have a considerable link to the tale of philosophy as cited by mevery theorists and thinkers. Many philosophical concepts used today have their p atomic number 18nthood in philosophical history and they be just an evolved form of the ideas generated in the last(prenominal). As a argona of fact, to give a an blanket(a) interpretation of predecessors is quite common in the philosophical world where Hegel, Heidegger and Nietzsche are often quoted as to give a contemporary philosophical thought by reviewing the history (Sorell & Rogers, pp. 1). However, philosophers in the English-Speaking part of the world do not care about its history since their type of philosophy is more of an analytical nature, which is required to be concise and relevant to the era in which people are living. The history of philosophy plays a significant role in giving an introduction and a dark knowledge of the sub ject to the aspiring students of todays world. It is important for initial philosophers to have a perfect(a) understanding of the basis of the subject upon which they would base their further supposals and concepts for the field to grow. Moreover, it is only through the knowledge of the history of philosophy that the philosophers would come to realize, which concepts and ideas were flawed and rejected like that of Descartes (Sorell & Rogers, pp. 2) so that they may look out for their new-fangled dimensions and correct them to widen the scope. History of any kind pertaining to any subject is an important aspect to check if growth is one of the objectives. Considering philosophy, we know well that at that place have been quite well known philosophers in the history of humankind who have made tremendous efforts in analyzing different philosophical problems and searching for their solutions in a logical manner. It would be merely a waste of time, money and resources if contemporary philosophers involve themselves in the same process in case they do not give any heed to the subjects history. Nevertheless, philosophy is one of the subjects whose concepts and ideas always have a hook. They are grown with related cerebrate and this way, subsequently, the field advances (Sorell & Rogers, pp. 4-5). Every other point always has a relevance to something of the pas that helps in giving an advanced(a) cognition for the contemporary philosophers and a chance to learn from their predecessors who might be dead but whose extensive researches are always present for them to learn and make progress. It is often said that the philosophers who fail to understand the previous(prenominal) accounts and happenings in the related field, subsequently, fail to hold a firm grasp over following assumptions and thusly end up with bas results (Sorell & Rogers, pp. 38). A philosopher can, certainly, not do philosophy without a perspective or without a standpoint. This standpoint or dire ction is given merely by having a thorough review of the past philosophers and their immense work done in this regards. The subject divided a multiple dimensional uprise by the doer and a well-done background analysis to proceed (Makumba, pp-11). In many cases, there has to be an intake which drives a philosopher to make further detailed analysis and take the object forward. This inspiration is the result of the philosophers research and review of the historical literature and the earlier philosophers. Additionally, in philosophy there are reservation of thoughts and ideas held by the people against or in favour of any theory or assumption put forward. These reservations are further carried by generations and generations in the same manner without actually referring to the actually happening. While, in philosophy, the contemporary philosophers should have a proper understanding of the past ideas and concepts and should hold their own judgement without any biases carried for genera tions. Only on the basis of first-hand knowledge of the historical accounts of ideas and concepts can the philosopher base a strong and true argument to