Saturday, November 16, 2019

Orpheus and Eurydice Essay Example for Free

Orpheus and Eurydice Essay The Greek myth says: in creativity you will succeed, only if you will be given immense experience of depth (to the experience, admitting Greeks necessary for creation; to experience, in which story experiences his immensity) for the sake of him. As for me, Depth does not concede itself, appearing face to face; she is opened, only hiding herself in product. The basic, relentless, answer. But the myth specifies as well that Orpheus it is not fated to obey this last law, and certainly, turning around to Eurydice , Orpheus destroys it and then collapses, and Eurydice again addresses in a shadow; under his sight the essence of night is opened in the insignificance. So it betrays also Eurydice, and night. But also not having turned back, it too will not avoid treachery, having showed incorrectness in relation to immense and reckless force of the impulse which demands Eurydice not in its day time true and ordinary charm, and in night shadows, in its remoteness, with the closed body and the sealed person; to force which tries to behold Eurydice, not when she is seen, but when is hidden, and not in affinity of an ordinary life but as the externality of that excludes any affinity, thirsts to not recover her, but to possess in it Ð ²Ã ¶Ã ¸Ã ²Ã µ completeness of its death. Only behind it also has gone down in Ð ¿Ã'€Ð µÃ ¸Ã' Ã ¿Ã ¾Ã ´Ã ½Ã'ŽÃ'Ž. All glory of his creations, all authority of his art, and desire of a happy life in fine clearness of day are brought in a victim to the unique care: to make out in night that at night hides, other night, Ã' Ã ²Ã »Ã' Ã µÃ ¼Ã ¾Ã µ concealment. Indefinitely problematic impulse condemned on day as unjustified madness or as a temptation by excessiveness. For day visit to the hell, having rummaged to depths, he has already an excess. And Orpheus inevitably neglects the law prohibiting turning back as this law is broken by him with a first step to an empire of shadows. From here there is a presentiment, which actually Orpheus all time has been inverted to Eurydice; to untouch touched in absence of a shadow, at that shaded presence which does not hide its absence, was presence of its infinite absence. Not having looked on it, it would not carry away her to itself(himself), and, undoubtedly, she not here, and it is absent in this sight, not less dead, rather than she, dead not serene death of the world which rest, the silence and the end, but that other death, which is endlessly, experience of absence of the end. Condemning invention Orpheus, he reproaches with obvious impatience. And mistake Orpheus, similarly, in the desire inducing it to see Eurydice to possess her whereas it can sing of her only. I consider that the fact that Orpheus says only in the song, attitudes with Eurydice is possible for him only in a hymn, he finds a life and true only after a verse and a verse, and Eurydice represents not that other as this magic dependence paying it outside of singing in a shadow, letting it to be free, alive, executed to authority only in the space proportional Orpheus. Yes I have noticed, Orpheus has authority above itself. Orpheus is guilty of impatience. His mistake is that he is going to exhaust infinity that believes a limit boundless, cannot support an impulse of own error endlessly. Impatience a mistake of the one, who wishes to avoid absence of time, patience dodge, attempt to subordinate this absence, transforming it in certain other, differently measured time. But the true patience does not exclude impatience to which it is intimately connected; it is gained and is indefinite continuouse impatience. Impatience of Orpheus, so, as well a due impulse: in the beginning of that becomes his passion, his highest patience, his infinite stay in death. Orpheus, not having obeyed the law, having looked on Eurydice, has only obeyed deep requirements as if the inspired impulse has captivated in the hell not clear shadow, is not realized has deduced her back in a wide daylight. To look on Eurydice, not caring about a song, in impatience and recklessness of desire overlooking the law, here is such inspiration. Whether it means, what the inspiration transforms beauty of night into unreality of emptiness, pays Eurydice in a shadow, and Orpheus in something indefinitely dead? Whether it means, what the inspiration is therefore that problematic moment when the essence of night becomes insignificant and welcoming affinity of the first night a deceptive trap of night other? We have a presentiment in inspiration only of his failure, we distinguish only fury not knowing to a way. But if the inspiration announces, that Orpheus has failed and Eurydice is lost for him again, announces insignificance and emptiness of night. The inspired and forbidden sight dooms Orpheus to loss everything not only, not only day time gravity, but also essence of night obviously and inevitably. The inspiration promises Orpheus destruction, promises to certitude, not promising instead of success to product, as well as not asserting in neither ideal triumph Orpheus, nor revival Eurydice. The story in the same degree is compromised with inspiration in what Orpheus falls under his threat. During this instant it reaches in the doubtfulness of a limit. That is why so frequently and with such force it also resists to that inspires it. The light of Light, the more actively hatred of Darkness is brighter. Sight Orpheus is his final gift to product, gift in which it from him refuses in which it sacrifices it, going to an immense impulse of desire to sources, and in which is not realized goes besides to the story, to sources of the story. And for Orpheus all grows in certitude of defeat, leaving in exchange only doubtfulness whether existed indeed something? Before the most doubtless masterpiece, whose beginning blinds shine and confidence, we, nevertheless, collide with something growing product suddenly again becomes hidden, it is not present and never here was. This sudden eclipse the remote memoirs on sight Orpheus, nostalgic return to doubtfulness of a source. So, all is staked, when dare at a sight. In this decision and coming up to sources the force of a sight untying essence of night, the removing care interrupting continuous, it opening, an instant of desire, carelessness and authority. The inspiration is connected by sight Orpheus to desire. Reading this myth, by the way, I thought not just about tragedy but also about their internal love. Not paying attention to his awful mistake I can see that he is a real hero. It is so impressive that he could make this for love to his princess of his heart without considering the risk. There is no constant things in the world but just one eternal – love of two people.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.